ARC

Description of Good Assessment Practice

Title: Dr.
Name: Julia Kuehn
Academic Position: Professorial staff
Name of Institution: University of Hong Kong
Country:
Discipline: Arts
Department/School:
Course title: ENGL2114
Course code:
Class size: 1-20
Course Year: Year 2/ Year 3
Assessment Title: Book Review in English Literature and Culture
Assessment Type: Summative
Time allowed for assessment: 4 weeks, outside contact hours
Target:
Learning outcomes of the assessment practice: Case Study:
While critical essays remain the main assessment method in an Arts degree, including English Studies, teachers can occasionally, depending on the nature of the course, introduce different writing exercises. This course asks students to engage with the genre of the book review: conducting independent library research they have to identify a book with a specific theme or agenda and then write a book review of the book. Having had guidelines and a short tutorial about how to produce a book review – which, indeed, asks for different writing and presentation skills than a critical essay – students are then assessed on how well they present a summary of the book, its agenda, its presentation, its language, the way it addresses a readership….

Strengths:
Students learn to engage with a ‘real life’ genre; they could imagine writing amazon.com book reviews or South China Morning Post book reviews. They learn to write in a different critical genre.

Weaknesses:
Having primarily written critical research essays some students find it difficult to engage with the new, different genre and produce book reviews that resemble all too closely research essays.

Future Work:
With more tutorial help, outside the classroom consultation and, probably, the assessment of drafts, students will hopefully find the shift from research essay and more familiar assessment methods to a new genre of writing easier.
Key features and principles of the assessment practice:
What are the best things about this assessment method?
What are the challenges in implementing this assessment method?
What do your students think about this assessment method? (Any evaluation?)
Plans for changes/developments in future (if any):
Attachment:
Creation date: 2010-02-05 13:35:50